Skip to main content
· 12/15/1960

Byerlite Corporation v. Parker C. Williams, District Director of Internal Revenue, Eighteenth District of Ohio

Citations

  • 286 F.2d 285
  • 6 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6069
  • 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the corporate treatment of amounts received was regarded as evidence of whether or not there was an intention to create a debt
  • where the corporate treatment of amounts received was regarded as evidence of whether or not there was an intention to create a debt
  • “In all cases, the prevailing consideration is that artifice must not be exalted over reality, whether to the advantage of the taxpayer, or to the government.”
  • advances on open account by a parent corporation to its subsidiary were loans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McALLISTER, Pope, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.