Byerley v. Philip Carey Co.
Citations
- 225 F. 77
- 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1220
Syllabus
<p>1. Patents <©=>259—Infringement—Sufficiency of Proof.</p> <p>A defendant cannot be held chargeable with infringement for purchasing and using an infringing product, where it is not shown that the patentee’s product was marked, or that defendant had notice of his rights. ■ [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. §§ 400-402; Dee. Dig. <©=>259.]</p> <p>2. Patents <©=>328—Infringement.</p> <p>Evidence held insufficient to establish infringement of the Byerley patent, No. 524,130, for a process of making asphaltic products from the residuum of petroleum after distillation and the products themselves.</p> <p><g=3l<’or other eases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests &, Indexes</p>
Judges: Orr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.