Skip to main content
· 2/22/2008

Byars v. Coca-Cola Co.

Citations

  • 517 F.3d 1256
  • 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3750
  • 2008 WL 466403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating district court's judgment and remanding where defendant did not seek summary judgment under the \any occupation\ definition and had never decided whether plaintiff was entitled to benefits under the \any occupation\ definition
  • “Finally, [defendant] was not subject to document withholding penalties, as [section 1132] only permits an award of penalties against the plan administrator.”
  • “We hesitate to require the district court to do more than . . . list the factors and conclude that they do not favor an award of fees.”
  • “While a district court may not deny penalties solely on the basis of a lack of prejudice, prejudice is a factor that a court should consider in exercising its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.