Buxton v. Colver
Citations
- 102 Kan. 871
- 171 P. 1158
- 1918 Kan. LEXIS 162
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Real-estate Broker — Binding Contract by Correspondence. Correspondence between a landowner and a broker by letters and telegrams, relating to finding a purchaser for land and to the commission to be paid, is held to constitute a binding contract between them, and the interpretation of such a contract is a question of law for the court.</p> <p>2. Same — Complete and Unambiguous Contract — May Not be Modified by Parol. The contract, being complete and unambiguous and having • provided for the payment of a specified commission if a purchaser of land was procured by the broker on stipulated terms, without any limitations as to the person to whom the sale might be made, must be regarded as a complete expression of the entire agreement as to commission, and it cannot be contradicted, added to, or modified by parol evidence of a prior oral agreement to the effect that no commission was to be paid if a sale was made to a particular person.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admissions of fraud in defendant’s answer not binding on co-defendant
- defendant not bound by admissions in answer of codefendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.