Butzberger v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abandoning vehicle-orientation factor in determining whether person was “using” a motor vehicle for purposes of UIM coverage
• discussing, in the context of uninsured motorist coverage, the four part test Washington courts apply to determine whether an insured was \using a vehicle\
• discussing, in the context of uninsured motorist coverage, the four-part test Washington courts apply to determine whether an insured was “using a vehicle”
• adopting a three-pronged test requiring(1) that there be a causal relationship or connection between the injury and the use of the insured vehicle; (2
• policy language to be given the same “ ‘fair, reasonable, and sensible construction as would be given to the contract by the average person purchasing insurance’ ” (quoting Overton v. Consol. Ins. Co., 145 Wn.2d 417, 424, 38 P.3d 322 (2002)
• abrogating the vehicle orientation factor of the four-part test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Butzberger v. Foster

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Butzberger v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-03· cited 2×
• Butzberger v. Foster
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-20
• Butzberger v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-18