Butz v. Pingel (In Re Pingel)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “... § 547(c)(1)(B) ... require[s] that the parties conduct bears out their alleged contentions.” Id. at 238-39
• “The purpose of adding the requirement [that the transfer be in fact a substantially contemporaneous exchange] is to avoid the inherent evidentiary difficulties of 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(1)(A) by requiring that the parties’ conduct bears out their alleged intentions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).