Butz v. Circuit Court of Randolph County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal statute \must be interpreted in accordance with principles of federal law\
• noting that “because it is a federal statute,” the QTA “must be interpreted in accordance with principles of federal law”
• noting that there was “no dispute” that “the [quitclaim deed] restrictions” asserted by the United States “are ‘claims’ ” under the QTA
• restrictions in quitclaim deeds from United States to plaintiff provided actual notice of use restrictions
• “To hold that the twelve-year [quiet title act] statute of limitations did not begin to run until conditions began changing would give rise to an interpretation of the term ‘claim’ under § 2409a(f) which would extend the limitations period indefinitely.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).