Skip to main content
· 6/7/1996

Butts v. Lawrence

Citations

  • 919 P.2d 363
  • 22 Kan. App. 2d 468
  • 1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, absent ambiguity, it is “error to consider . . . extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent”
  • explaining that, absent ambiguity, it is “error to consider ... extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gernon, Marquardt, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.