Button v. Kremer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a plaintiff driver was given general guidelines and instructions but was not penalized for failing to adhere to such guidelines, the defendant employer did not exercise sufficient control over the plaintiff to establish an employee-employer relationship
• noting fact “that Defendants had little control over when Plaintiff drove, how much he dr[o]ve, or how frequently” “very persuasively]” supported independent contractor status.
• independent contractor driver controlled “how much overall money he earned as a result of the number of calls he took and fares he earned.”
• independent contractor driver controlled “how much overall money he earned as a result of the number of calls he took and fares he earned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).