Skip to main content
· 5/15/1986

Buttnick v. City of Seattle

Citations

  • 719 P.2d 93
  • 105 Wash. 2d 857
  • 1986 Wash. LEXIS 1137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the city's requirement that a landowner in a historic preservation district replace a parapet on her building did not amount to an unconstitutional taking given the cost of the replacement and the market value and income producing potential of the building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dore, Pearson, Andersen, Callow, Goodloe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.