Skip to main content
· 4/30/1894

Buttner v. Smith

Citations

  • 4 Cal. Unrep. 627
  • 36 P. 652
  • 1894 Cal. LEXIS 1215

Syllabus

<p>Options—Acceptance.—Defendant Gave Plaintiff a Written Option to purchase stock for $3,100 cash and the balance on time. On the last day of the option plaintiff said he would take the stock “according to the terms of the writing,” but defendant, desiring time to get a portion thereof from one to whom it was pledged, indorsed aq extension of eleven days on the agreement. After such extension, plaintiff let defendant have $3,100 to get the pledged stock, but he failed to do so, and, after the expiration of the option, demanded the return of the $3,100. Held, that there was no binding acceptance of the option.</p> <p>Option.—Plaintiff is Entitled to Interest on the Sum sought to be recovered from the date of his demand for its return.</p>

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.