Skip to main content
· 3/20/2007

Butterbaugh v. Chertoff

Citations

  • 479 F. Supp. 2d 485
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19628
  • 2007 WL 870117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that relevant factors to the joint employment analysis include “authority to hire and fire employees, promulgate work rules and assignments, and set conditions of employment,” “day-to-day supervision of employees,” and “control of employee records”
  • noting that, unlike Title VII’s definition of “employer,” which contained a minimum size requirement, Title VII’s definition of “employee” “contains nothing that obviously cabins the operation of Title VII, leaving intact the full sway of the statute’s remedial purpose”
  • dismissing the “single-employer test” in Nesbit as “more tailored to unraveling purposefully convoluted corporate structures” than to the typical joint employment relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.