Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[b]ecause issues regarding the scope of Defendant’s authorization goes to the merits of the case, the Court does not consider it at this juncture.”
• finding that inconsistencies in the plaintiff's testimony did not impact his ability to serve as the class representative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).