Buttari v. Norwalk
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4163
Syllabus
Trial court properly granted summary judgment to political subdivisions in negligence action, where the political subdivisions are immune from suit under Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code and appellant failed to establish that such immunity should be abrogated under the exception to immunity set forth in R.C. 2744.02(B)(4).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he breach [of implied covenant] claim in [Wolens ] related to prices and services because the alleged facts referenced ticket-pricing and access to flights”
- “Indeed, compared to either Wolens or Morales, the link in Rowe was more directly related to ‘routes, rates, or services’ because it regulated primary activity that feel under the ADA, thereby frustrating Congress’s ‘manifest purpose’ to deregulate the industry.”
- “In Wolens all the justices — including the dissenters— agreed that the ADA does not preempt common law tort claims such as personal injury and wrongful death, even though airline costs and fares would be affected by how restrictive a particular state’s law may be.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.