Butler v. State ex rel. Franklin County
Citations
- 81 Miss. 734
Syllabus
<p>1. County Officers. Tase, collector. County treasurer. Receipt. Fraud. Mistake. Parol evidence.</p> <p>An official receipt of a county treasurer given a tax collector is not conclusive in a controversy between them as to whether the money had been paid, although the issue was made by cross-bill of the treasurer in an equity suit begun by the state, for the use of the county, against both officers and the sureties on their respective official bonds; and in such suit on such issue parol evidence is admissible to show that the receipt was obtained by fraud and delivered by mistake.</p> <p>3. Same. Treasurer's official bond. Sureties.</p> <p>An official receipt given by a county treasurer to the tax collector is only prima facie evidence that the money was paid, as against the sureties on the treasurer’s official bond, in a suit brought thereon by the state for the use of the county.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- A servant is liable for an injury produced by an affirmative misfeasance, but not for mere neglect; the remedy in that case being against the master alone.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.