Skip to main content
· 12/13/1995

Butler v. State Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 909 P.2d 163
  • 138 Or. App. 190
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purported judgment that fails to meet requirements of ORCP 67 B cannot be “corrected” nunc pro tunc
  • where an employee of a contracting party acts within the scope of her authority intending to benefit the principal, we identify her actions with that contracting party
  • ‘‘[I]f plaintiff can establish that he suffered discrimination at his employment because he made a complaint ‘related to’ safe and healthful working conditions, he has met the elements necessary to establish a claim under [ORS 654.062(5)].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Leeson, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.