Skip to main content
· 4/11/1936

Butler v. Rumbeck

Citations

  • 143 Kan. 708
  • 56 P.2d 80
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a landowner does not owe any duty to a trespasser in the absence of willful and wanton misconduct
  • recognizing that a landowner does not owe any duty to a trespasser in the absence of willful and wanton misconduct
  • holding that amending a complaint to add a medical malpractice claim barred by the statute of limitations was futile
  • stating that when deciding on a motion for summary disposition, evidence is to be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party
  • stating that when deciding on a motion for summary disposition, evidence is to be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party
  • “[A] plaintiff will be granted invitee status only if the purpose for which she was invited onto the owner’s property was -3- directly tied to the owner’s commercial business interests.” [Quotation marks and citation omitted.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thiele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.