Skip to main content
· 11/13/1975

Butler v. Philadelphia

Citations

  • 236 Pa. Super. 701
  • 347 A.2d 725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if presumed fact is “met and encountered” by defendant’s contrary evidence, burden of proof remains with plaintiff and is “not for the defendant to show that [the presumed fact] does not exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.