Butler v. Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding untimely a motion to intervene that was filed fifteen months after proposed intervenor knew or should have known of his interest in the case
• police officer had a direct and protectable interest in not being prevented from employment based on race
• 15 month delay after applicant knew or should have known of interest
• 15 month delay after applicant knew or should have known of interest
• seven year hiatus from entry of final decree to filing motion was untimely
• “A Rule 24 interest must be ... direct as opposed to remote____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).