Butler v. Michigan State Disbursement Unit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting contention that agency’s retention of accrued interest on child- 37 support payments it processed was unconstitutional taking because “plaintiff’s net loss was zero”
• claimant alleged unconstitutional taking based on agency’s retention of accrued interest on child-support payments it processed, although retention of accrued interest was authorized by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).