Skip to main content
· 3/17/1987

Butler v. Ingle (In Re Ingle)

Citations

  • 70 B.R. 979
  • 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that the property in question is included in the debtor’s amended petition does not excuse its original omission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: A. Thomas Small

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.