Skip to main content
· 2/17/1905

Butler v. Evening Leader Co.

Citations

  • 134 F. 994
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that simply because an attorney is involved in a communication does not make the communication privileged, nor does a single email of a legal nature “privilege the entire email thread.”
  • explaining that the 1 Here, Defendants argue that the investor agreements go to Plaintiff’s financial health, but 2 fail to explain how it connects to the merits of the case or Plaintiff’s damages. (Discovery Letter 3 No. 6 at 2-3, 4.
  • analyzing ESI protocol that declined to include a statement of what information 15 “may be necessary to resolve certain disputes about privilege claims[.]”
  • “Briefs, declarations or other 4 proof may establish the purpose of the communication or the specific role of the sender and each 5 individual recipient.”
  • “Briefs, declarations or other proof may establish the purpose of the 22 communication or the specific role of the sender and each individual recipient.”
  • “Briefs, declarations or other proof may 23 establish the purpose of the communication or the specific role of the sender and each individual 24 recipient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.