Skip to main content
· 8/3/1995

Butler v. Board of Sup'rs for Hinds County

Citations

  • 659 So. 2d 578
  • 1995 WL 456198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal based on the minutes rule, even though the contract changes had been approved by the board architect, because the changes were not entered upon the board minutes
  • “[T]he policy of protecting the public’s funds for use by and 10 Case: 24-60647 Document: 47-1 Page: 11 Date Filed: 08/07/2025 No. 24-60647 for the public is paramount to other individual rights which may also be involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Pittman and James L. Roberts, Jr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.