Skip to main content
· 11/22/2013

Butler v. Balolia

Citations

  • 736 F.3d 609
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23569
  • 2013 WL 6153784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Washington Supreme Court would \in all probability recognize the enforceability of contracts to negotiate\ after surveying much of the same authority discussed above
  • explaining that \precedents and trends in other jurisdictions\ appropriately may be consulted in determining what a state's highest court might rule
  • stating that, when reviewing an order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, this court may consider \facts susceptible to judicial notice\ (quoting Haley v. City of Bos., 657 F.3d 39, 46 (1st Cir. 2011))
  • supplementing facts in complaint “by examining ‘documents incorporated by reference into the complaint, matters of public record, and facts susceptible to judicial notice’”
  • supplementing facts in complaint with “documents incorporated by reference into the complaint, matters of public record, and facts susceptible to judicial notice”
  • vacating dismissal of claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where plaintiff alleged the existence of a contract to negotiate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.