Buti v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining plaintiffs omission of the fact that the movant used the mark in Milan was not an omission that was “material” because use of the mark in foreign commerce would not led the USPTO to deny the trademark registration
• finding no jurisdiction over action between permanent resident alien and foreign corporation
• \Although ... the decisions of the TTAB are not binding on this Court ... they are nevertheless entitled to great weight.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).