Bustos v. Rubera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sentence reduction was not warranted where, among other factors, “the court had already varied downward by five years from Ruffin’s guidelines range when imposing [a] lengthy sentence”
• noting that sentence reduction was not warranted where, among other factors, “the court had already varied downward by five years from Ruffin’s guidelines range when imposing [a] lengthy sentence”
• noting that sentence reduction was not warranted where, among other factors, “the court had already varied downward by five years from Ruffin’s guidelines range when imposing [a] lengthy sentence”
• noting that sentence reduction was not warranted where, among other factors, “the court had already varied downward by five years from Ruffin’s guidelines range when imposing [a] lengthy sentence”
• “When considered with the whole record, the district court’s decision more than adequately explained why the § 3553(a) factors did not support a sentence reduction.”
• no abuse of discretion in denying sentence reduction because district court considered “rehabilitation efforts” but defendant’s “conduct while in prison did not all run in the same direction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).