Bustop, Inc. v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding California state courts’ desegregation order, including extensive busing and race-based school assignments, as not “required” but certainly “permitted” by the U.S. Constitution
• denying a request to stay implementation of a voluntary desegregation plan and noting that there was \very little doubt\ that the Constitution at least permitted its implementation
• denying a request to stay implementation of a desegregation plan and noting that there was \very little doubt\ that the Constitution at least permitted its implementation
• denying a request to stay implementation of a voluntary desegregation plan and noting that there was “very little doubt” that the Constitution at least permitted its implementation
• denying a request to stay implemen- tation of a voluntary desegregation plan and noting that there was “very little doubt” that the Constitution at least permitted its implementation
• denying a request to stay implementation of a de- segregation plan and noting that there was “very little doubt” that the Constitution at least permitted its implementation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).