New Mexico Supreme Court· 1/15/1857
Bustamento v. Analla
Citations
- 1 N.M. 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, in ruling on a custody dispute, that “[i]t is to the benefit and welfare of the infant to which the attention of the court ought principally to be directed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deavenport
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shorty v. ScottNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-06-04· cited 40×
- Diamond v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-07-02· cited 25×
- Roberts v. StaplesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-07-01· cited 24×
- Bassett v. BassettNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-11-20· cited 24×
- Cook v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-07-10· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Human Services Department v. AguirreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-07-24· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Day v. ParkerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-10-24· cited 5×
- In Re Guardianship of HowardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-02-19· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.