Bussberg v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “single violation of the conditions of probation is sufficient to support the [trial court's] decision to revoke probation.”
• holding that the trial court is not required to explain the particular punishment for a probation violation
• holding that it was “harmless error” to base revocation partly on a violation for which the defendant did not receive notice when the defendant was also found in violation regarding another offense for which he did receive notice
• use of defendant’s statements during probation revocation hearing did not violate Fifth Amendment; probation proceedings are civil in nature
• “[p]roof of a single violation of the conditions of probation is sufficient to support the decision to revoke probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).