Skip to main content
· 11/11/1933

Buskirk v. Hein

Citations

  • 138 Kan. 337
  • 26 P.2d 263
  • 1933 Kan. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \general allegations\ that \delay causes witnesses' memories to fade\ are insufficient
  • holding that “general allegations” that “delay causes witnesses’ memories to fade” are insufficient
  • holding that “the time needed to adjudicate defense motions is charged to defendant”
  • concluding “that the work-product privilege applies in the context of criminal proceedings to the work product of the prosecutor”
  • providing that “while anxiety caused by a lengthy delay can occur, anxiety alone cannot establish a speedy-trial violation”
  • explaining that “general allegations of prejudice,” such as that “delay causes witness’ memories to fade,” are insufficient to establish a speedy-trial violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey, Hutchison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.