Skip to main content
· 6/4/2014

Business Integra, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 116 Fed. Cl. 328
  • 2014 WL 2507393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “regulatory regime” applicable to sealed bidding “differs significantly” from the regime applicable to procurement by negotiation
  • observing that the “regulatory regime” applicable to sealed bidding “differs significantly” from the regime applicable to procurement by negotiation
  • recognizing “the inability of an agency to declare an immaterial term to be a material one”
  • discussing a protestor’s omission of labor rate pricing information for certain spreadsheet entries
  • “Because Business Integra’s error was material, the government was under no obligation to waive the error or allow Business Integra to correct the error.”
  • “Because Business Integra’s error was material, the government was under no obligation to waive the error or allow Business Integra to correct the error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles F. Lettow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.