Bushnell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the legislature “implicitly found that a working tolerance of .01 percent of a properly calibrated instrument was ‘tolerably inaccurate’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Motor Vehicle Administration v. Lytle
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-08· cited 36×
• Kimberlee Michelle Bratcher v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-10-20· cited 2×
• Jason Barnebey v. State of Alaska, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2020-04-10· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Holmes v. State Board of Finance
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-12-19· cited 39×
• Barcott v. State, Department of Public Safety
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-09-11· cited 29×
• State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-05-06· cited 25×
• Haynes v. State, Department of Public Safety
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 19×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-10-23· cited 18×
• McCracken v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-08-31· cited 15×
• Mangiapane v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-03-19· cited 11×
• Kalmakoff v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-02-21· cited 9×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Flack
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-08-10· cited 9×
• Ansay v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-03-21· cited 3×