Bushnell v. Sapp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a no-fault statutory scheme, taken as a whole, was a reasonable substitute for traditional tort remedies
• determining that a no-fault statutory scheme, taken as a whole, was a reasonable substitute for traditional tort remedies
• determining that a no-fault statutory scheme, taken as a whole, was a reasonable substitute for traditional tort remedies
• “Classes can certainly be treated differently, so long as this unequal treatment is based on reasonable differences.”
• where threshold requirement for direct action against alleged tortfeasor not satisfied, injured person’s exclusive remedy is under the “no fault” Act
• \no-fault\ act elimination of some recovery for pain and suffering is for the legislature to determine, not the courts, and perfection in the classification is not constitutionally required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).