Skip to main content
· 1/4/1897

Bushnell v. Leland

Citations

  • 164 U.S. 684
  • 17 S. Ct. 209
  • 41 L. Ed. 598
  • 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1701

Syllabus

<p>It has been repeatedly settled, by this court that the Comptroller of the Cur- ■ -rency has'power to appoint a receiver to a defaulting or insolvent national bank, aud to call for a ratable assessment upon the stockholders of such, bank, without á previous judicial ascertainment of the necessity for such action; and the contention that there is presented in this -case a constitutional question not considered in the prior cases is an assumption with no foundation in fact.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that “empowering [the comptroller] either to appoint a receiver or to make a ratable call upon the stockholders, is tantamount to vesting that officer with judicial power, in violation of the constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.