Bushnell v. Leland
Citations
- 164 U.S. 684
- 17 S. Ct. 209
- 41 L. Ed. 598
- 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1701
Syllabus
<p>It has been repeatedly settled, by this court that the Comptroller of the Cur- ■ -rency has'power to appoint a receiver to a defaulting or insolvent national bank, aud to call for a ratable assessment upon the stockholders of such, bank, without á previous judicial ascertainment of the necessity for such action; and the contention that there is presented in this -case a constitutional question not considered in the prior cases is an assumption with no foundation in fact.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the argument that “empowering [the comptroller] either to appoint a receiver or to make a ratable call upon the stockholders, is tantamount to vesting that officer with judicial power, in violation of the constitution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-09-20· cited 173×
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court· 1935-04-01· cited 142×
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-02-05· cited 113×
- Adams v. NagleSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 98×
- Christopher v. NorvellSupreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 83×
- Forrest v. JackSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 82×
- Studebaker v. PerrySupreme Court· 1902-02-24· cited 53×
- Bennett v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1922-12-07· cited 53×
- Patrick Collins v. Steven Mnuchin, SecretarFifth Circuit· 2019-09-06· cited 51×
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1922-06-28· cited 50×
- Deweese v. SmithEighth Circuit· 1901-02-25· cited 46×
- Liberty Nat. Bank of South Carolina v. McIntoshFourth Circuit· 1927-01-11· cited 45×
- Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court· 1899-04-18· cited 44×
- Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-04-30· cited 38×
- King v. PomeroyEighth Circuit· 1903-03-09· cited 36×
- Korbly v. Springfield Institution for SavingsSupreme Court· 1917-12-10· cited 33×
- Commissioner of Banks v. Prudential Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1922-06-28· cited 29×
- Hanson v. SoderbergWashington Supreme Court· 1919-01-10· cited 26×
- Lowell Co-operative Bank v. Co-operative Central BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-06-30· cited 24×
- Wannamaker v. Edisto Nat. Bank of OrangeburgFourth Circuit· 1933-01-10· cited 23×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.