Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[p]roof of infringement requires construction of the patent claims to determine their scope and comparison of the construed claims to the accused device.” (citing Elbex Video, Ltd. v. Sensormatic Elecs. Corp., 508 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2007
• finding irreparable harm based on the plaintiffs claims of loss of market share and price erosion because the plaintiffs provided evidence that the asserted harms were incalculable and not compensable through money damages
• “the prospect of collecting money damages from a foreign defendant with few to no assets in the United States tips in favor of a finding of irreparable harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).