Bushman Construction Co. v. Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[g]enerally, different models of a product will be relevant if they share with the accident-causing model those characteristics pertinent to the legal issues raised in the litigation”
• “Courts in this District have repeatedly held that ‘confidential’ does not equate to ‘nondiscoverable’ or ‘privileged.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).