Bush v. Hawaiian Homes Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants must have participated in a contested case
• holding that judicial review by the circuit court of the agency's denial of the appellants' request for a contested case hearing as well as review of the merits of the agency's decision \is unattainable due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction\
• holding that the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the claims of persons aggrieved by a final agency decision involving third party agreements because the subject matter of the hearing did not concern “property interests” under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act and the HAR
• holding that the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the claims of persons aggrieved by a final agency decision involving third party agreements because the subject matter of the hearing did not concern \property interests\ under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act and the HAR
• holding that the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the claims of persons aggrieved by a final agency decision involving third party agreements because the subject matter of the hearing did not concern “property interests” under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act and the HAR
• holding that if the statute governing the activity in question does not mandate a hearing prior to the administrative agency's decision-making, the actions of the agency do not amount to a \final decision or order in a contested case\ from which an appeal is possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).