Bush v. Craig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ERISA’s overall scheme does not support a fiduciary’s claim for contribution or indemnification from a non-fiduciary”
• “The text and stated purpose of the statute negate the inference that Congress intended courts to create federal common law that would permit a fiduciary to seek contribution or indemnification from a non-fiduciary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).