Bush v. Clark Construction & Concrete Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s claim for failing to exhaust administrative remedies because employees covered by a CBA “must attempt to use the grievance procedures previously agreed upon by the employer and union before resorting to any other form of redress”
• “Because plaintiff failed to adhere to the grievance process outlined in the CBA, the Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
• “Section 301 of the LMRA not only preempts state law but also authorizes removal of claims that purported to seek relief only under state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).