Skip to main content
· 7/18/1974

Busching v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 524 P.2d 369
  • 12 Cal. 3d 44
  • 115 Cal. Rptr. 241
  • 1974 Cal. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he ordinary rules of grammar . . . must be applied unless they lead to an absurd result . . . .”
  • “Unless the record affirmatively discloses the existence of a sufficient excuse or the basis for an estoppel.”
  • “[I]t is not to be presumed that the legislature in the enactment of statutes intends to overthrow long-established principles of law unless such intention is made clearly to appear either by express declaration or by necessary implication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McComb, Wright, Tobriner, Burke, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.