Buschi v. Kirven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the elements of a § 1985 claim are “(1) conspiracy of two or more persons, (2) who are motivated by a specific class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus, to (3) deprive the plaintiff of the equal enjoyment of rights secured by the law to all, (4
• discussing evolution of the doctrine and applying it to a § 1985(3) claim
• “A corporation cannot conspire with itself any more than a private individual can, and it is the general rule that the acts of the agent are the acts of the corporation.”
• applying the doctrine to a claim under § 1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).