Busch-Provo, Ltd. v. Sloan (In Re Larsen)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that right to a jury trial remains in tact where the claims-allowance process is never triggered
• declining to equate counterclaim with filing proof of claim for purpose of determining whether right to a jury trial is waived
• disagreeing with Crab-tree 4 court held that the filing of a counterclaim to determine ownership of funds held by the estate is not the equivalent of filing a proof of claim and does not invoke the claims allowance process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).