Buscemi v. Bensel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an issue is generally not preserved for appellate review unless it was raised before and decided by the trial court
• stating that “it is legitimate for the Legislature to amend a law that it believes the judiciary has wrongly interpreted”
• stating that an issue is moot if its resolution cannot have a practical effect on the existing controversy
• stating that an issue becomes moot when “a judgment, if entered, cannot for any reason have a practical legal effect on the existing controversy”
• stating that an issue becomes moot when “a judgment, if entered, cannot for any reason have a practical legal effect on the existing controversy”
• explaining that an issue is moot if an event has occurred that render it impossible to grant relief or when a judgment “cannot for any reason have a practical legal effect on the existing controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).