Burton W. Wiand v. Roberta Schneiderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s challenges to the existence of the con- tract failed as the district court “correctly determined that a con- tract had been formed”
• noting that a court “may revisit neither the legal merits of the award nor the factual determinations upon which it relies”
• declaring that this Court lacks power to review whether the “weight of the evidence presented” supported the arbitrator’s decision, and rejecting an appellant’s argument that the arbitrator’s decision should be vacated because it was “based on no evidence”
• finding the “entire argument for vacatur is based on the weight of the evidence presented, and that is simply beyond this court’s—or the district court's—power to review”
• “When reviewing an arbitration award … we may revisit neither the legal merits of the award nor the factual determinations upon which it relies.”
• “When reviewing an arbitration award ..., we may revisit neither the legal merits of the award nor the factual determinations upon which it relies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).