Burton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The uncontroverted expert proof is that it has always been considered to be a violation of acceptable engineering principles of good building design and construction, and hazardous and unsafe to have a door swing outward and over stairs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• DeVeau v. United States
  N.D. New York· 1993-09-16· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gramm v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1967-06-28· cited 25×
• Gramm v. State
  New York Court of Appeals· 1968-04-18· cited 23×
• Jensen v. Casale
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1964-12-23· cited 4×
• In re Henry
  New York Court of Appeals· 1957-07-03· cited 2×
• Butler v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1967-03-15· cited 1×