Burton v. Sparler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding issues of fact existed as to whether party had constructive notice of lis pendens; title search performed for the party did not reveal the lis pendens and record was incomplete on reasons why the lis pendens was not discovered during title search
• finding issues 14 of fact existed as to whether party had constructive notice of lis pendens; title search performed for the party did not reveal the lis pendens and record was incomplete on reasons why the lis pendens was not discovered during title search
• “One who purchases the property with notice of the lis pendens ... is then bound to the outcome of the pending litigation, even though they were not otherwise a party to it.”
• “[o]ne who purchases the property with notice of the lis pendens [] is then bound to the outcome of the pending litigation, even though they were not otherwise a party to it”
• “One who purchases the property with notice of the lis pendens . . . is then bound to the outcome of the pending litigation, even though they were not otherwise a party to it.”
• “[T]he grantee of a security deed is under no duty to the grantor to have the deed recorded; as between the original parties, the deed is valid irrespective of whether it is recorded or not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).