Skip to main content
· 5/5/1971

Burton v. Peartree

Citations

  • 326 F. Supp. 755
  • 3 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 508
  • 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13443
  • 3 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a lengthy rambling complaint which contains little more than demands, charges and conclusions . . . is not a short and plain statement of the case and flagrantly violates” Rule 8
  • absolute immunity for filing documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huyett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.