· 5/5/1971
Burton v. Peartree
Citations
- 326 F. Supp. 755
- 3 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 508
- 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13443
- 3 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a lengthy rambling complaint which contains little more than demands, charges and conclusions . . . is not a short and plain statement of the case and flagrantly violates” Rule 8
- absolute immunity for filing documents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huyett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.