Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Burton v. Kakani

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 916
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 795
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3405
  • 571 U.S. 1136
  • 2014 WL 102587
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party only bound to arbitration agreement if she had \notice of [its] existence\
  • recognizing that there is a \hybrid between a clickwrap and browsewrap agreement\
  • noting that a district court may treat a motion to dismiss as a motion to compel arbitration where the moving party manifests \an intent ... to compel arbitration\
  • noting that past injuries may provide a basis for standing for injunctive relief where the plaintiff can demonstrate that it is “likely to be harmed again in the future in a similar way”
  • finding that a sign-up page gave insufficient notice where it contained cluttered information including “between fifteen and twenty-five links,” “text . . . displayed in at least four font sizes and six colors,” and “multiple buttons and promotional advertisements”
  • noting, under Washington law, that a contract was formed when a plaintiff submitted an order on Amazon.com

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.