· 7/10/1998
Burton v. Clark County
Citations
- 958 P.2d 343
- 91 Wash. App. 505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a condition requiring the applicant to build a road served valid government purposes, including traffic control
- noting that an exaction “in plain terms is just the government’s proposed solution to the identified public problem”
- applying Nollan/Dolan to county requirement that permit applicants make \road dedications and improvements\
- applying Nollan/Dolan to county requirement that permit applicants make \road dedications and improvements\
- casting doubt on the legitimacy of government exactions that primarily serve commercial interests
- “[T]he second prong is the same as asking whether governmental conduct tends to solve the identified public problem.” (citing Presbytery, 114 Wn.2d at 330)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.