Skip to main content
· 7/10/1998

Burton v. Clark County

Citations

  • 958 P.2d 343
  • 91 Wash. App. 505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a condition requiring the applicant to build a road served valid government purposes, including traffic control
  • noting that an exaction “in plain terms is just the government’s proposed solution to the identified public problem”
  • applying Nollan/Dolan to county requirement that permit applicants make \road dedications and improvements\
  • applying Nollan/Dolan to county requirement that permit applicants make \road dedications and improvements\
  • casting doubt on the legitimacy of government exactions that primarily serve commercial interests
  • “[T]he second prong is the same as asking whether governmental conduct tends to solve the identified public problem.” (citing Presbytery, 114 Wn.2d at 330)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.