Skip to main content
· 7/12/1982

Burton v. Bank of Tuckerman

Citations

  • 276 Ark. 538
  • 637 S.W.2d 577
  • 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the petitioner “must show compliance with the requirements of section 17A.19 (1), requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies, and section 17A.19(4), specifying the concise requirements of a petition for judicial review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.